Talk:Captain Lou Albano's Steady Descent into Madness - Revision history

71.231.56.40 at 19:30, 30 September 2007

2007-09-30T19:30:39Z

2007-09-30T17:23:15Z

2007-09-30T17:04:56Z

2007-09-30T06:36:05Z

2007-09-29T05:06:35Z

2007-09-29T01:14:36Z

New page: How exactly is this must-see? --~~~~

New page

How exactly is this must-see? --[[User:69.255.193.4|69.255.193.4]] 18:14, 28 September 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 30 September 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	And this isn't a classic. At least not on the level of Hyakugojyuuichi or CNB, or even BAGAGAGAGA BOP!, which isn't a Must-See for some reason. It isn't a very good example of animutation either, considering it uses an English song and the first half of it is just people talking. --[[User:69.255.193.4\|69.255.193.4]] 10:23, 30 September 2007 (PDT)		And this isn't a classic. At least not on the level of Hyakugojyuuichi or CNB, or even BAGAGAGAGA BOP!, which isn't a Must-See for some reason. It isn't a very good example of animutation either, considering it uses an English song and the first half of it is just people talking. --[[User:69.255.193.4\|69.255.193.4]] 10:23, 30 September 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	I said if the ''general consensus'' finds it a classic, that is, that most people find it a classic. [[User:71.231.56.40\|71.231.56.40]] 12:30, 30 September 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 30 September 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I was thinking that if the general consensus is that it's a classic, it's to be labeled as a Must-see. That's my reasoning. [[User:71.231.56.40\|71.231.56.40]] 10:04, 30 September 2007 (PDT)		I was thinking that if the general consensus is that it's a classic, it's to be labeled as a Must-see. That's my reasoning. [[User:71.231.56.40\|71.231.56.40]] 10:04, 30 September 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	And this isn't a classic. At least not on the level of Hyakugojyuuichi or CNB, or even BAGAGAGAGA BOP!, which isn't a Must-See for some reason. It isn't a very good example of animutation either, considering it uses an English song and the first half of it is just people talking. --[[User:69.255.193.4\|69.255.193.4]] 10:23, 30 September 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 30 September 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Meh. Probably my least favorite of Cicierega's. Still very good, but I don't think it should be included in the Must-See category. -Anonymous		Meh. Probably my least favorite of Cicierega's. Still very good, but I don't think it should be included in the Must-See category. -Anonymous
		+
		+	I was thinking that if the general consensus is that it's a classic, it's to be labeled as a Must-see. That's my reasoning. [[User:71.231.56.40\|71.231.56.40]] 10:04, 30 September 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 30 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	<br>		<br>
	Why the crap shouldn't it be a must-see? [[User:71.231.56.40\|71.231.56.40]] 22:06, 28 September 2007 (PDT)		Why the crap shouldn't it be a must-see? [[User:71.231.56.40\|71.231.56.40]] 22:06, 28 September 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	Meh. Probably my least favorite of Cicierega's. Still very good, but I don't think it should be included in the Must-See category. -Anonymous

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 29 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How exactly is this must-see? --[[User:69.255.193.4\|69.255.193.4]] 18:14, 28 September 2007 (PDT)		How exactly is this must-see? --[[User:69.255.193.4\|69.255.193.4]] 18:14, 28 September 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	Well, it's a classic animutation, it's colorful, trippy, and weird...<br>
		+	<br>
		+	Why the crap shouldn't it be a must-see? [[User:71.231.56.40\|71.231.56.40]] 22:06, 28 September 2007 (PDT)