Talk:ScientLOLojyuuichi!! - Revision history

Mr. Basso: /* Nomination */

2009-06-01T00:56:07Z

Nomination

Alex Cameron at 09:13, 1 September 2008

2008-09-01T09:13:56Z

Alex Cameron at 09:12, 1 September 2008

2008-09-01T09:12:03Z

Alex Cameron at 09:11, 1 September 2008

2008-09-01T09:11:47Z

Mr. Basso at 20:23, 29 August 2008

2008-08-29T20:23:28Z

Abracadabra123: Help me! I'm on a animutated rampage!

2008-08-29T19:26:54Z

Help me! I'm on a animutated rampage!

Alex Cameron at 04:44, 25 August 2008

2008-08-25T04:44:25Z

Mr. Basso at 19:57, 23 August 2008

2008-08-23T19:57:49Z

Abracadabra123: My opinion.

2008-08-23T19:41:32Z

My opinion.

Neryon: Removing earlier comment

2008-02-08T23:22:22Z

Removing earlier comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 1 June 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:

	* Offensiveness? What on god's green earth are you talking about. So far Animutation Portal has recieved no complaints about people being offended. I would be more outraged if I knew what you were saying. --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 02:12, 1 September 2008 (PDT)		* Offensiveness? What on god's green earth are you talking about. So far Animutation Portal has recieved no complaints about people being offended. I would be more outraged if I knew what you were saying. --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 02:12, 1 September 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+	...Wait, didn't we agree that this wasn't a Must-See? [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 17:56, 31 May 2009 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 1 September 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* Wait, what? You had me at "but who knows why". [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 13:23, 29 August 2008 (PDT)		* Wait, what? You had me at "but who knows why". [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 13:23, 29 August 2008 (PDT)

−	* Offensiveness? What on god's green earth are you talking about. ~~You can't just come in here waving your "not relevent to the topic of discussion" pro-censorship mumbo-jumbo~~. I would be more outraged if I knew what you were saying. --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 02:12, 1 September 2008 (PDT)	+	* Offensiveness? What on god's green earth are you talking about. So far Animutation Portal has recieved no complaints about people being offended. I would be more outraged if I knew what you were saying. --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 02:12, 1 September 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 1 September 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* Wait, what? You had me at "but who knows why". [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 13:23, 29 August 2008 (PDT)		* Wait, what? You had me at "but who knows why". [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 13:23, 29 August 2008 (PDT)

−	* Offensiveness? What on god's green earth are you talking about. You can't just come in here waving your "not relevent to the topic of discussion" pro-censorship mumbo-jumbo. I would be more outraged if I knew what you were ~~talking about~~. --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 02:11, 1 September 2008 (PDT)	+	* Offensiveness? What on god's green earth are you talking about. You can't just come in here waving your "not relevent to the topic of discussion" pro-censorship mumbo-jumbo. I would be more outraged if I knew what you were saying. --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 02:12, 1 September 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 1 September 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:

	* Wait, what? You had me at "but who knows why". [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 13:23, 29 August 2008 (PDT)		* Wait, what? You had me at "but who knows why". [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 13:23, 29 August 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+	* Offensiveness? What on god's green earth are you talking about. You can't just come in here waving your "not relevent to the topic of discussion" pro-censorship mumbo-jumbo. I would be more outraged if I knew what you were talking about. --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 02:11, 1 September 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 29 August 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	The Best Defence is a good Offence!<br>		The Best Defence is a good Offence!<br>
	[[User:Abracadabra123\|Abracadabra123]] 12:26, 29 August 2008 (PDT)		[[User:Abracadabra123\|Abracadabra123]] 12:26, 29 August 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+	* Wait, what? You had me at "but who knows why". [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 13:23, 29 August 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 29 August 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	* What about ''A Sticky Night of Love''? That has Jesus H. Christ in it, so it might be considered offensive to Christians. ''Allosaurus.gif'' has depictions of homosexuality. ''Hyakugojyuuichi'' has the middle fingers, which could offend uppity soccer moms. And then there's ''Irrational Exuberance''. I don't think this should be a Must-See either, but there are better reasons why. [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 12:57, 23 August 2008 (PDT)		* What about ''A Sticky Night of Love''? That has Jesus H. Christ in it, so it might be considered offensive to Christians. ''Allosaurus.gif'' has depictions of homosexuality. ''Hyakugojyuuichi'' has the middle fingers, which could offend uppity soccer moms. And then there's ''Irrational Exuberance''. I don't think this should be a Must-See either, but there are better reasons why. [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 12:57, 23 August 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+	* Just Sticky night of love? Whu bout the whole COLIN VS JHC trilogy, no I'm not offended by that, but still, this is NOT a "must-see", but who knows why, if not offensiveness, besides, sometimes animutations can't help but be offensive, and what about the crudely drawn nudity so crudely drawn that only people with good imaginations can constitute it as nudity...<br>
		+	The Best Defence is a good Offence!<br>
		+	[[User:Abracadabra123\|Abracadabra123]] 12:26, 29 August 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 25 August 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	* No. This is not Hyakugojyuuichi 4. Hyakugojyuuichi 1,2, 2003, have all been origional animutations that were made to be Hyakugojyuuichi ___. This is another animutation that was made to be a different animutation. Rebranding an animutation to be something else is just lazy. If you want there to be a Hyakugojyuuichi 4 so bad, why don't you make it? --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 12:39, 8 February 2008 (PST)		* No. This is not Hyakugojyuuichi 4. Hyakugojyuuichi 1,2, 2003, have all been origional animutations that were made to be Hyakugojyuuichi ___. This is another animutation that was made to be a different animutation. Rebranding an animutation to be something else is just lazy. If you want there to be a Hyakugojyuuichi 4 so bad, why don't you make it? --[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 12:39, 8 February 2008 (PST)
		+	**Wow, I really don't know what I was talking about there. Also, the no still stands.--[[User:Alex Cameron\|Alex Cameron]] 21:44, 24 August 2008 (PDT)

	*I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --[[User:Spoonorca\|Spoonorca]] 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST)		*I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --[[User:Spoonorca\|Spoonorca]] 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 23 August 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	*It's not really a "Must-See" because it might offend, I'm not a scientologist, and in fact I found this rather funny, but it ''does'' make fun of a "religion", so I vote no as well. [[User:Abracadabra123\|Abracadabra123]] 12:41, 23 August 2008 (PDT)		*It's not really a "Must-See" because it might offend, I'm not a scientologist, and in fact I found this rather funny, but it ''does'' make fun of a "religion", so I vote no as well. [[User:Abracadabra123\|Abracadabra123]] 12:41, 23 August 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+	* What about ''A Sticky Night of Love''? That has Jesus H. Christ in it, so it might be considered offensive to Christians. ''Allosaurus.gif'' has depictions of homosexuality. ''Hyakugojyuuichi'' has the middle fingers, which could offend uppity soccer moms. And then there's ''Irrational Exuberance''. I don't think this should be a Must-See either, but there are better reasons why. [[User:Mr. Basso\|Mr. Basso]] 12:57, 23 August 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 23 August 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	*I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --[[User:Spoonorca\|Spoonorca]] 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST)		*I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --[[User:Spoonorca\|Spoonorca]] 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST)
		+
		+	*It's not really a "Must-See" because it might offend, I'm not a scientologist, and in fact I found this rather funny, but it ''does'' make fun of a "religion", so I vote no as well. [[User:Abracadabra123\|Abracadabra123]] 12:41, 23 August 2008 (PDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Nomination ==
-* I nominate this movie as a must-see.  A "Hyakugojyuuichi 4" to my opinion.  Any questions? --[[user:Neryon|Wartys Neryon]]
+* I nominate this movie as a must-see.  Any questions? --[[user:Neryon|Wartys Neryon]]
 I don't think so.  I feel uncomfortable about about nominating a parody of another animutation as a must-see.  By the way, while it's probably Kepple?, it's definitely not Zekey. [[User:Mr. Basso|Mr. Basso]] 12:32, 8 February 2008 (PST)