|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{vfdheader}}
| + | #REDIRECT [[FanimutationWiki:Articles for Deletion]] |
| − | | |
| − | Please do not write in this. I am only doing this here for a demonstration to users who have never before did any AFD discussions.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | All votes should be in boldline (three apostrophes ['] on each end):
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Keep''' for all those who decided against the article's removal. Be sure to include your supporting points such as that of notability or guarentee of enhancement and/or cleanup. If agreeing with another person, you may just write messages like "per nom," "as per nom," or "per (agreeing user's name [bound with double brackets ([[]])])" -- Signature and date (PDT)
| |
| − | * '''Comment''' For those who argue one's point of view. As in any vote, an explanation wouldn't bite. And before you do comments, place an asterisk (*) and a space before your first letter. -- Signature and date (PDT) (and dates are day, month, year, time)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Delete''' for all those who decided for the article's removal. Include GOOD reasons why the articles should be deleted (we've had a few AFD'd animation articles protected under [[Cicierega's First Law]]). You can also agree with those you agree with (ah, you know: all this "per nom" stuff). -- Signature and date (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''No vote''' for all those who can't decide what the fate of the article should be... yet. They could do a few comments regarding the article's material. The person may also '''Abstain''', in which he wouldn't vote. -- Signature and date (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Examples:
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Keep''' Because there is plenty of information. It just would use a good cleaning. -- Bob. 13 Neveruary Never Never:Never (PDT)
| |
| − | * '''Comment''' Most of the information is crap, and doesn't cover the important thing. -- Chuck Norris. 13 Neveruary Never Never:Never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Keep''' as per Bob. -- Weebl. 13 Neveruary Never Never:Never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Delete'''. As much as this article has some interesting information around here, most of it is just fluff, fluff, FLUFF. In fact so much fluff I would have killed you with my roundhouse kick (please don't make comments like that). Far less importance than necessary. -- Chuck Norris. 13 Neveruary Never Never:Never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''No Vote'''. Despite some complaints that most of the article is full of crap, it has some pretty valuable information and a good share of crap. Not to mention the references are nice, but is horribly written. I will reconsider later. -- The Neverman. 13 Neveruary Never Never:Never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Abstain'''. I would much rather avoid such an article. Causes flamewars. -- Santa Claus. 13 Neveruary Never Never:Never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | All this is a demonstration. On the date, never say never. Just do the right numbers and month name. How to do the signature:<br>
| |
| − | * Write your user accounts link (for example - User:Bob)<br>
| |
| − | * Put a line (|) after your username<br>
| |
| − | * Write anything you wish, like what you prefer to be called<br>
| |
| − | * Put double brackets ([[]]) around all that<br>
| |
| − | * You could skip steps 2 and 3 if you wish, but many people use those<br>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Thus concludes the tutorial of how to vote in AFD article talks. Thank you! -- [[User:Neryon|Wartys Neryon]] 2 August 2006 20:48 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | An easier way to do all that is by using three tildes (Shift+weird key in the top left) for your name, and four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) for your name plus a timestamp. If you want to have an alternate name, write a signature template and use double hook-bracket thingies ({{}}) to say something like this: ({{Weebl/sig}}). Hope this helps! [[User:Davidizer13|Davidizer13]] 22:27, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | And if possible, you can '''Recall''' your vote to some other thing if you found one observation stronger than what you hold. The only way a recall does not have to be used is if you used the '''No Vote''' before. You may never recall to '''Abstain''', because you already voted.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Here are a couple examples:
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Keep''', for it has lots of information. --Bill Cosby never:never never nevruary, never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Recall''' past vote to '''Delete'''. I found out that most of it is linked to spam. --Bill Cosby never:never never nevruary, never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''No vote''', because of a hard decision. --Pac-Man never:never never nevruary, never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Keep''', because it has good information about all those dots I eat. --Pac-Man never:never never nevruary, never (PDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | This is all I'll have to say. Thanks! --[[User:Neryon|Wartys Neryon]] 10:16 25 Aug, 2006 (PDT)
| |
