Difference between revisions of "Talk:ScientLOLojyuuichi!!"
From FanimutationWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Removing earlier comment) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Nomination == | == Nomination == | ||
| − | * I nominate this movie as a must-see | + | * I nominate this movie as a must-see. Any questions? --[[user:Neryon|Wartys Neryon]] |
I don't think so. I feel uncomfortable about about nominating a parody of another animutation as a must-see. By the way, while it's probably Kepple?, it's definitely not Zekey. [[User:Mr. Basso|Mr. Basso]] 12:32, 8 February 2008 (PST) | I don't think so. I feel uncomfortable about about nominating a parody of another animutation as a must-see. By the way, while it's probably Kepple?, it's definitely not Zekey. [[User:Mr. Basso|Mr. Basso]] 12:32, 8 February 2008 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 8 February 2008
Nomination
- I nominate this movie as a must-see. Any questions? --Wartys Neryon
I don't think so. I feel uncomfortable about about nominating a parody of another animutation as a must-see. By the way, while it's probably Kepple?, it's definitely not Zekey. Mr. Basso 12:32, 8 February 2008 (PST)
- No. This is not Hyakugojyuuichi 4. Hyakugojyuuichi 1,2, 2003, have all been origional animutations that were made to be Hyakugojyuuichi ___. This is another animutation that was made to be a different animutation. Rebranding an animutation to be something else is just lazy. If you want there to be a Hyakugojyuuichi 4 so bad, why don't you make it? --Alex Cameron 12:39, 8 February 2008 (PST)
- I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --Spoonorca 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST)
