Difference between revisions of "Talk:ScientLOLojyuuichi!!"
From FanimutationWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchAlex Cameron (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* No. This is not Hyakugojyuuichi 4. Hyakugojyuuichi 1,2, 2003, have all been origional animutations that were made to be Hyakugojyuuichi ___. This is another animutation that was made to be a different animutation. Rebranding an animutation to be something else is just lazy. If you want there to be a Hyakugojyuuichi 4 so bad, why don't you make it? --[[User:Alex Cameron|Alex Cameron]] 12:39, 8 February 2008 (PST) | * No. This is not Hyakugojyuuichi 4. Hyakugojyuuichi 1,2, 2003, have all been origional animutations that were made to be Hyakugojyuuichi ___. This is another animutation that was made to be a different animutation. Rebranding an animutation to be something else is just lazy. If you want there to be a Hyakugojyuuichi 4 so bad, why don't you make it? --[[User:Alex Cameron|Alex Cameron]] 12:39, 8 February 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | **Wow, I really don't know what I was talking about there. Also, the no still stands.--[[User:Alex Cameron|Alex Cameron]] 21:44, 24 August 2008 (PDT) | ||
*I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --[[User:Spoonorca|Spoonorca]] 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST) | *I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --[[User:Spoonorca|Spoonorca]] 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 20:44, 24 August 2008
Nomination
- I nominate this movie as a must-see. Any questions? --Wartys Neryon
I don't think so. I feel uncomfortable about about nominating a parody of another animutation as a must-see. By the way, while it's probably Kepple?, it's definitely not Zekey. Mr. Basso 12:32, 8 February 2008 (PST)
- No. This is not Hyakugojyuuichi 4. Hyakugojyuuichi 1,2, 2003, have all been origional animutations that were made to be Hyakugojyuuichi ___. This is another animutation that was made to be a different animutation. Rebranding an animutation to be something else is just lazy. If you want there to be a Hyakugojyuuichi 4 so bad, why don't you make it? --Alex Cameron 12:39, 8 February 2008 (PST)
- Wow, I really don't know what I was talking about there. Also, the no still stands.--Alex Cameron 21:44, 24 August 2008 (PDT)
- I oppose as well. While a good parody, it's a hybridmutation, so it's not a necessity for it to be a must see, as must sees are generally ones that are considered to give a good taste of what animutation is like. --Spoonorca 12:50, 8 February 2008 (PST)
- It's not really a "Must-See" because it might offend, I'm not a scientologist, and in fact I found this rather funny, but it does make fun of a "religion", so I vote no as well. Abracadabra123 12:41, 23 August 2008 (PDT)
- What about A Sticky Night of Love? That has Jesus H. Christ in it, so it might be considered offensive to Christians. Allosaurus.gif has depictions of homosexuality. Hyakugojyuuichi has the middle fingers, which could offend uppity soccer moms. And then there's Irrational Exuberance. I don't think this should be a Must-See either, but there are better reasons why. Mr. Basso 12:57, 23 August 2008 (PDT)
